Floyd302 wrote:
momanddadof2, I can’t blame you for not wanting your children to see that. And those thugs are laughing if they think they are scaring anybody. That just makes them bolder. I’ve always been against carrying guns. I’ve always thought if you had to kill somebody, they weren’t worth taking the chance of going to prison over in the first place. But this whole episode has just about changed my mind. I could take care of myself when I was younger, but it’s starting to sink in that I’m not that young anymore. And like hmmm1885 wrote, you don’t ever see just one when you run across them. It’s always 4 or 5, and sometimes even more. And there comes a time that it’s best if you have something to even the odds a little bit. You have a good evening..
8/31/2009 9:42 PM EDT on WBIR.com Recommend Report Abuse Permalink
hmmm1885 wrote:
Floyd302, once again I agree with you. If we stick together, those so called wannabe soldiers won’t stand a chance. I would glady stand to get rid of garbage like that, me and about 4000 others.
momanddadof2, you should never tell or let anyone know you are afraid of them, that just makes them feel that much more empowered, which is what this trash preys on.
8/31/2009 9:40 PM EDT on WBIR.com Recommend Report Abuse Permalink
jroule wrote:
JANITOR MOP I WAS SAING THAT THE BLACKS WANNA SAY THAT WE (WHITES)ARE MAKING IT A RACIAL THING MY OPINION IS….. EYE FOR EYE . AND REGARDLESS FOR SOMEONE TO DO THE CRIMES THESE WORTHLESS ——S DID I SAY KILL EM KILL EM ALL. BUT JESSE JACKSON WOULD BE WALKING DOWN THE STREET TALKING BOUT”MY BROTHERS AND SISTAS”? ALL I WAS SAYING I SAY LETS GO GET EM AND FIGHT FOR CHANNON AND CHRIS….THEY CANT SPEAK SO WE SHOULD SPEAK FOR THEM ….
8/31/2009 8:59 PM EDT on WBIR.com Recommend (1) Report Abuse Permalink
momanddadof2 wrote:
Floyd, I admit it, that web-site scared the hell out of me. My husband and I both write under this heading, but yes it is me the wife. I started crying when I was on that page. I can’t read it. I hope someone has shown it to the police. Dear God, that is the sickest thing. I would be horrified for my children to see that. It is not that I am trying to “stick my head in the sand” , I’m just afraid of these criminals and their cohorts.
8/31/2009 8:58 PM EDT on WBIR.com Recommend (1) Report Abuse Permalink
Floyd302 wrote:
momanddadof, did you read any of the links on that website? Those people are well organized. They even talked about canvassing Davidson Co. with their “foot soldiers” and talked about knowing that Letalvis would not get the DP. Their being linked to the girl that was murdered on the campus of North Carolina should tell you something. The judge is beating a dead horse if there is any truth about the jury deal. And the stuff about the grave sites. That website wasn’t just thrown together. There has been alot of time and planning gone into that. You, or nobody else, should just stick your head in the sand and say: boy, I hope they don’t know how much they scarred me. And then tell everybody else to stay away from that site. If this don’t wake some of these “politically correct” people up, I don’t know what will! I’ll give the bast@*d$ credit. They stick together. It’s time it worked the other way around people!!!
8/31/2009 8:51 PM EDT on WBIR.com Recommend (1) Report Abuse Permalink
JanitorMop wrote:
jroule wrote: “And it really bites my a– that someone would turn it in to a racial thing.”
Obviously it IS a racial thing whether you want to admit it or not.
Attorney General Randy Nichols is so afraid of being branded a “racist” that he won’t admit the obvious truth – what these evil sub-human creatures have done is a racially motivated hate crime.
All of you here that would call one of your kinsmen a racist for simply speaking the truth ought to be ashamed of yourself.
Revelation 22:15 “For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and WHOSOEVER LOVETH AND MAKETH A LIE.” (and accuse a truthful person of being a racist)
For any that make a lie and love a lie you will not get into the Kingdom of GOD at the end. THINK ABOUT THAT!
8/31/2009 8:42 PM EDT on WBIR.com Recommend Report Abuse Permalink
jroule wrote:
hmmmm1885 im with you
8/31/2009 8:38 PM EDT on WBIR.com Recommend (1) Report Abuse Permalink
jroule wrote:
lmao eric boyd is special he went to school with my hubby and was in speacial classes.
8/31/2009 8:34 PM EDT on WBIR.com Recommend Report Abuse Permalink
hmmm1885 wrote:
I’ll bet these black foot soldiers can’t handle one on one can they? Nope, they have to have four or five against one.Cowards. A bunch of low life trash!! I can’t believe what I was reading about those kids. Saying they were asking for it? I hope that if I ever come across any of you POS that God has mercy on your soul, I won’t have any on your sorry @ss!
8/31/2009 8:31 PM EDT on WBIR.com Recommend (3) Report Abuse Permalink
momanddadof2 wrote:
Actually I have to say, I do not recommend looking at that web-site. It is going to give me nightmares and I wouldn’t want the people who made it to think they have something that people want to see. Whoever is responsible for putting that garbage on line needs to be horse whipped.
8/31/2009 8:07 PM EDT on WBIR.com Recommend (2) Report Abuse Permalink
panics’ does not offer a particularly appropriate explanation for this rape scare, but it does suggest fruitful lines of investigation by pointing to the relation between anxiety and the desire of the dominant classes in any society to maintain control. The hypothesis advanced in this case study is that fear of losing control was a constant undercurrent in the thinking of the settler minority. This substratum of anxiety rose to the surface in the form of a moral panic whenever disturbances in the economy or the body politic were severe enough to unsettle the mask of composure worn by the face of public authority. In a patriarchal society where women were part and parcel of property to be defended against threats from below, fear of rape was a special concern of white males. For that reason the study of colonial rape scares differ markedly from studies of rape pure and simple. Unravelling the complicated web of male concerns about gender, property and politics is a difficult business at any time, but some progress can be made by studies of this kind which focus on societies which believe they face a fundamental assault upon their domestic arrangements.(Read more)
Studies have shown that violent and aggressive criminals are more likely to have abused animals as children than criminals considered non-aggressive. A survey of psychiatric patients who had repeatedly tortured dogs and cats found that all of them had high levels of aggression toward people as well, including one patient who had murdered a boy. To researchers, a fascination with cruelty to animals is a red flag in the lives of serial rapists and killers. Says Robert Ressler, founder of the FBI’s behavioral sciences unit, “These are the kids who never learned it’s wrong to poke out a puppy’s eyes.”
Re: Eve Carson’s Family May Have Owned Slaves (Negros on the attack and victim blamin
Today, 01:47 PM 
racist troll drivel 
March 14th, 2008 at 9:02 am If you’re on probation and you commit a crime, your ass goes to jail. That’s how probation is supposed to work.From here on out, any judge who gives probation to someone who’s already on probation should be removed from his or her bench permanently. Many of the murder victims here in Charlotte, as well as in Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, and other cities and towns all over this state, were killed by criminals who were repeatedly sentenced to probation by lazy, criminally-negligent, seemingly-afraid-to-do-their-job judges who, in my opinion, are clearly unqualified to be in their positions and who are partially responsible for those murders. You cut the guy loose and he killed someone; that person would still be alive if you’d done your job.What I want to hear about now is judges who ask “Is the defendant already serving probation?” and, when the answer is in the affirmative, reply with “Fine. Now he’s going to jail for the crime he already committed AND this new one. And I want it noted in his criminal record that he’s an habitual offender and should never be given probation again.”
March 14th, 2008 at 9:29 am Here’s my brilliant proposal — and you legal eagles can flesh it out –The Citizenship Deductible — We need to fess up and admit the State cannot — or will not — protect us from petty criminals. As a result, the State henceforth will not attempt to prosecute or apprehend suspects in involved in thefts or robberies resulting in losses of approximately $1000 or less.Instead, property owners will have the duty and responsibility to protect their own property. To that end, the charge of homicide will not be applied to any property owner using deadly force to protect OR recover their property valued over $1 up to approximately $1000.Over $1000, the citizen will be eligible for a badge and being duly deputized. Over $10,000 they will be eligible to replace any member of the General Assembly currently serving from the citizen’s district, provided that member themselves had not also recovered $10,000 or more in private property from criminals. Over $100,000, the citizen will be eligible to finish the current term of governor.
March 14th, 2008 at 11:16 am Doesn’t a violent crime mean you commit violence against another individual? Breaking and entering just doesn’t seem like a violent crime. Nor does having a fire arm while you are on probation.I’m not sure some conservatives won’t be happy until the U.S. resorts to a soviet style police state to fight crime.
March 14th, 2008 at 12:26 pm It shouldn’t matter what type of crime they commit while on probation… they should go to jail and serve a sentence. Probation is a freebie in NC… it means nothing. I’d say 3/4 of the arrested thugs I post on my website are on probation, electronic monitoring, etc. No doubt, if probation were enforced in NC, we would see less crime because the repeat offenders would be jailed on probation violations.
March 14th, 2008 at 12:56 pm Howie Says: “Doesn’t a violent crime mean you commit violence against another individual? Breaking and entering just doesn’t seem like a violent crime.”Only if you bastardize the meaning of the work violence (why is it that libs love misusing words?)violence–using or involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.dj
March 14th, 2008 at 2:01 pm From the news and record:“From the bench, Brown chided the media, saying they were focusing on the case because one of the victims was a young, white woman. Black crime victims, he said, don’t get nearly as much attention.”Ain’t that the truth.The kid who murdered Eve Carson was 17 years old. What in his life turned him into this monster? This kid isn’t an aberration. It happens every day, young black men killing mostly each other. Rarely does the violence make it outside the ‘hood.These people aren’t born with a “thug” gene. They are nurtured into thugs. Seems like it would make more sense to go after the source of the problem instead of continually plugging holes until another one pops open.I would start by legalizing drugs. And no, I’m not kidding.
March 14th, 2008 at 3:15 pm Yes, Howie, I want us to have Soviet-style justice here in the US. [rolls eyes]What I really want is this:1. If you commit a non-violent property crime, you can either go to jail OR you can get probation if it can be shown to the judge that this was a one-off event and you’ve learned your lesson…2. … unless you’re already on probation or parole, in which case you don’t get another bite at the probation apple: You’re going to jail.3. Crimes against a person (assault, rape, murder, etc.) should NEVER be punished with probation. There should be a jail term of at least a certain length, followed by early parole if they’ve been a well-behaved inmate.When people learn that “if you do the crime, you will do the time” has meaning, perhaps they will commit less crimes. This may not reduce the number of criminals, per se, but it will reduce the total number of crimes the criminals have the opportunity to commit.And if kids are being nurtured into thugs, all the more reason we should remove them from the streets. If you want to try to change things to discourage people from becoming criminals, great; but the ones who do commit crimes need to be locked up for the protection of the rest of us.
Right now, though, all these young punks are learning is that you can do pretty much whatever you want and there are no real consequences. That needs to end.
March 14th, 2008 at 4:17 pm Clay, I agree with everything you just said. By no means am I saying we shouldn’t arrest those who commit crimes. And I totally agree that there are way too many people who commit violent crimes who are walking the streets. The time served for commiting a violent crime should be substantial. No arguements there.In a way it goes back to legalizing drugs: our prisons are filled with people either using or selling drugs who spend a hell of a lot more time behind bars than many violent offenders. Get the drug offenders out of prison and maybe there would be room for violent criminals. The U.S. already has the highest precentage of prisoners in the world. Why? Because we think by keeping pot smokers behind bars we’re actually winning the “war” drugs.By the way, which lobbiests put the most pressure on Gov to maintain stupid drug laws? The lobbiests who represent prison unions. Go figure.
March 14th, 2008 at 4:26 pm Elect Pat McCrory as governor, and all of our problems with crime, gangs, and illegal immigration will
magically disappear.Who is setting the example for the youth in this community, when it is well-known that crime, gangs, and illegal immigrants are rarely proscecuted.Actions speak louder than McCrory’s words!
March 14th, 2008 at 9:37 pm What in his life turned him into this monster? This kid isn’t an aberration. It happens every day, young black men killing mostly each other.Some of the details emerging about the Lovette kid are that he was adopted by a solidly middle-class couple, but the adoptive father died a few years ago, after which, the kid started to tailspin. Whatever. To be honest, I really don’t care.But, more broadly, the problem is that absolutely nothing is actually expected of the black underclass by broader society, and this is particularly true of underclass males. No one really expects them to take school seriously, obey their mothers (or whoever got stuck raising them – fathers are practically an afterthought), obey the law, be monogamous, marry any of the mothers of their children, make any significant contribution towards the raising of such children, or hold a steady job. With the arrival of cheap immigrant labor over the past decade, they’re essentially superfluous. Well, except for being sperm donors to the women stupid enough to bear their progeny.The problem isn’t “poverty” (at least of any material sort) and it’s not discrimination. When both of those were a lot worse for blacks prior to the 1960s, they didn’t regularly produce adolescent sociopaths like these two.And none of this will change significantly until we begin making social policy that draws intelligent distinctions between the poor who are deserving of help (such as the elderly or disabled) and those who aren’t (such as these two able-bodied miscreants). The question isn’t how much does food stamps or Section 8 housing cost on the budget; it’s how much is it going to cost 15 years down the road when you’ve created a class of people who have none of the habits and mores necessary for self-sufficiency.The problem is that no one is willing to address it. The left likes it just the way it is and the right’s afraid of the political consequences of trying (not that the GOP wouldn’t find a way to screw it up in any event).
March 14th, 2008 at 10:31 pm What turns them into thugs? Good question. It’s one to which I suspect there is no single answer that can be applied in such a way as to allow a remeidal program to actually be expected to have an impact. For example, there’s a strong independent correlation between youthful violent criminal activity and illegitimate birth with no father in the home. But clearly that isn’t ALWAYS the case, and even if it were there really is no reasonable governmental approach to that with a prayer of being politically viable. There’s a much less strong correlation between poverty and crime, as well as incomplete education and crime, but in all of those things the correlation becomes almost insignificant the illegitimate birth, no fahter in the home kids are removed from the equation. That doesn’t realistically leave much room for remediation.
March 15th, 2008 at 1:09 am Eve Carson’s Family Owned SlavesEve Carson’s family may have owned slaves in Athens, Georgia. Plus, word on the streets is Eve was buying drugs and playing Privileged White Flaunt – where privileged whites drive through underprivileged black neighborhoods at dangerous hours to tease poor blacks with their possessions.
March 15th, 2008 at 1:27 am Please tell me those two links are satirical in nature.Because if they’re not, anyone who believes even one iota that she deserved what happened to her because of what her family might have done 150 years ago or what she might have done back in her hometown seriously needs to be taken out and beaten unconscious. I am not kidding.
March 15th, 2008 at 1:48 am The more disturbing thing than the probability of her family owning slave, is her going out and playing this sick game affluent whites play to mock impoverished blacks. If she was playing the Privileged White Flaunt or whatever, she deserved what she got. Too, if her family owned slaves and didn’t pay their reparations. If so (on the reparations) her Highlander actually belonged to Atwater and Lovett. That’s if she wasn’t seeking something more from them.
March 15th, 2008 at 1:54 am If she was playing the Privileged White Flaunt or whatever, she deserved what she got. Too, if her family owned slaves and didn’t pay their reparations.Wow. I mean, wow. That is possibly the most revolting thing I have ever read.
March 15th, 2008 at 1:59 am And just to be clear here: What is revolting is that you would somehow think it’s valid that a college student should deserve to be MURDERED because of something her family might have done back in the 1800s, or because of some tasteless game she might have played back in her hometown. Her murder is ABSOLUTELY INEXCUSABLE, and for you to suggest otherwise demonstrates that you are truly an awful human being.Please take your hatemongering somewhere else. (Jeff, let me know if I’ve stepped over a line here. But right now this “jixjacousins” creature has pissed me off more than anyone has in a very, very long time.)
March 15th, 2008 at 2:10 am No, Clay, HER BEHAVIOR IS WHAT IS INEXCUSABLE! To purposely drive around through impoverished areas where blacks live to FLAUNT your race and privilege (privilege that was acquired from the African American Slave Trade) THAT IS INEXCUSABLE! Why didn’t her family disclose they owned slaves before she was killed?